|
The MURE scenarios are built and run on the basis of sets
of assumptions concerning mainly two types of variables:
- the energy performance of technologies
- the expected penetration rates of energy efficient technologies
(see Figure 1)

Fig. 1
MURE is therefore a bottom-up, technology-related simulation
tool, allowing to:
-
choose the end-use sector for the simulation (household
or transport or industry or tertiary)
-
identify and select the scope of the interventions (or
policies) that one wants to simulate, for instance, deciding
to look only at building insulation, or at boilers efficiency,
etc., or at whatever combination of those
-
describe the interventions in detail. This means, for
instance, deciding that, within the end of the period analysed
in the scenario, the entire stock of newly installed appliances
will belong to a given labelling Class, or, for what industrial
boilers are concerned, that the EU relevant Directives will
be fully enforced, etc. This can be done in a more or less
detailed and elaborated way: for instance, for what concerns
retrofitting interventions on the insulation of existing
buildings (see Figure 2), one may enter into such details
as the selection of the insulation material for each building
component, the thickness of the layer of insulating material,
etc.
-
make assumptions on the future performance of the technologies
(or devices, etc.) involved by the interventions that one
has selected. In principle, all such values are already
in the MURE database, and, when preparing the scenario,
one may simply validate the proposed values, such as, for
instance, the reference efficiency of a given class of appliances,
or the expected efficiency gains to be expected from the
introduction of variable speed motors, etc. However, one
may, at this stage, introduce his/her own assumptions concerning
this or that technology, if the default values suggested
by the database are deemed unrealistic (this could happen,
for instance, for the target value proposed by MURE for
the average efficiency of future gas boilers, or of solar
water heating systems, etc.)
-
make assumptions on the future penetration rates that
can be expected for each of the envisaged technologies.
This means deciding on which share of the total stock (of
appliances, of buildings, of boilers, etc.), the previously
described intervention will be actually carried out. This
may be quite simple for such interventions as the application
of the building codes, for which the most obvious thing
to do is use a 100 % share applied to new construction,
i.e. all new buildings will conform to the codes. It can
be much trickier for other interventions, such as the introduction
of advanced industrial production processes, for which the
expected rate of penetration clearly depends on the nature
of the incentives, if any, and, generally speaking, on a
number of behavioural aspects which are not explicitly described
in MURE. In such cases, the experience of the analyst defining
the scenario is clearly crucial if realistic assumptions
must be made
-
at this point, MURE runs the calculations, through a sequential
process which is thoroughly described both in the manuals
and in the actual interactive simulation process, and produces
results in terms of technical energy savings potential corresponding
to the entire (and cumulated) set of interventions that
one has selected. The results are automatically compared
to the so-called reference scenario (see Figures 3 and 4).
This is meant to be the typical "business as usual"
scenario, where reference consumptions, and the evolution
of the existing stocks, are roughly extrapolated based on
the start-year values as well as on some basic assumptions
on variables such as the expected net growth of the number
of buildings (there is however some degree of freedom which
is left to the user for what concerns the definition of
the reference scenario).

Fig. 2: Simulation of insulation intervention in individual houses

Fig 3: Penetration of the building stock with energy efficient technologies

Fig 4: Results screen
In conclusion, as explained above, MURE looks at the impact
on energy consumptions of technology related assumptions,
mainly dealing with issues such as:
-
How efficient future technologies will be?
-
How effective energy policies will be in promoting efficient
technologies?
-
How much energy can be saved, and pollutant emission reduced,
if the assumptions made on the two previous issues are realistic?
The basic simulation logic is the same for all end-use sectors;
there are however some important differences from one sector
to another.
For instance, as far as industry and tertiary are concerned,
the assumptions on future penetration rates of energy efficient
technologies are facilitated through proposed values, which
correspond to the so-called "maximum penetration rates"
(i.e.: considering the current structure of industry, and
the very nature of the processes, what is the limit beyond
which it is deemed unfeasible to introduce new and more efficient
technologies?). These values, which are made available by
the MURE database and which the analyst can visualise while
proceeding with the simulation, are drawn from sectoral studies
available at the national and European level.
In the following sections, two examples of RUE scenarios
are presented, together with the corresponding results obtained
through MURE simulation.
|
|